1. Each member treats the nationals of the other members no less favourable than that accorded to its own nationals in the area of intellectual property protection (3), subject to the exceptions already provided for by the Paris Convention (1967), the Bern Convention (1971), the Rome Convention or the Treaty on Intellectual Property with regard to integrated circuits. For performers, phonogram producers and broadcasters, this obligation applies only to the rights of this agreement. Any member who uses the possibilities of Article 6 of the Berne Convention (1971) or Article 16, paragraph 1, point b) of the Rome Convention notifies the Council for TRIPS. The WTO regularly organizes symposia, training and other events on intellectual property, trade and other related topics in collaboration with other international organizations. For more details on the events, click here. TRIPS has imposed the dominant system of intellectual property on the world in the United States and Europe, as humans are today. I believe that the development of the IP system is not good for the United States and the EU; but I believe even more that it is not in the interest of developing countries. 2.
For the purposes of this agreement, the concept of intellectual property applies to all categories of intellectual property that are the subject of Sections 1 to 7 of Part II. Review of the terms of application of members Members must inform the TRIPS Council of their relevant laws and regulations. This will help the Council to review the functioning of the agreement. 3. Members grant the treatment of other members to nationals of other members under this agreement. 1. With regard to relevant intellectual property law, nationals of other members are considered to be natural or legal persons who would meet the protection criteria provided by the Paris Convention (1967), the Bern Convention (1971), the Rome Convention and the Intellectual Property Treaty, taking into account the integrated channels, all WTO members. 2.
Any member who makes use of the possibilities provided for in Article 5, paragraph 3, or Article 6, paragraph 2, of the Rome Convention, notifies the Council on Intellectual Property Rights relating to trade (The TRIPS Council). Trips-plus conditions, which impose standards beyond TRIPS, have also been verified.  These free trade agreements contain conditions that limit the ability of governments to introduce competition for generic drug manufacturers. In particular, the United States has been criticized for promoting protection far beyond the standards prescribed by the TRIPS. The U.S. free trade agreements with Australia, Morocco and Bahrain have expanded patentability by making patents available for new uses of known products.  The TRIPS agreement authorizes the granting of compulsory licences at the discretion of a country. The terms of trips plus in the U.S.
Free Trade Agreement with Australia, Jordan, Singapore and Vietnam have limited the application of mandatory licences to emergencies, remedies for cartels and abuse of dominance, and cases of non-commercial public use.  Notifications – Members` transparency toolkit shares information about their intellectual property laws, rules and practices through submissions to the TRIPS Council.